About us    Campaigns    Research    Support us    Publications    Media Room    Join Us    Contact us

Romney attacks Obama’s education policy

Global news, US

WASHINGTON: Calling it a “national education emergency,” Mitt Romney said Wednesday that poor and disabled children should be allowed to escape failing public schools by using federal dollars to pay for private schools and other alternative settings.
Under a banner that read “A Chance for Every Child,” the likely GOP presidential nominee seized on K-12 education, an area that had so far been overlooked on the campaign trail. It is also considered one of President Barack Obama’s strengths, bringing him more bipartisan support than any other issue and winning him accolades from Republican governors such as Chris Christie of New Jersey and John Kasich of Ohio.
Romney borrowed from Obama, calling education “the civil rights issue of our era,” but then tried to draw a sharp contrast, saying the president was beholden to teacher unions and blaming him for escalating college costs, among other things.
During a speech before the Latino Coalition’s Annual Economic Summit in Washington, Romney said he would “do everything in my power to reverse this decline” in America’s schools, adding that if it were not for the economic recession and housing crisis, education would be “the great cause of this campaign.”
Romney said he wanted to expand choices for families so that children can flee failing schools. His campaign released a white paper highlighting his support for federal vouchers — a plan to reroute tax dollars sent to public schools to help educate poor and disabled children and instead let those dollars follow the children to private schools. The federal government will spend $48.8 billion this year to help educate poor and disabled children.
Progressive groups said Romney’s approach would return the country to the days without accountability. “We have a long history in this country, and you can see it in the civil rights struggle to desegregate schools, of states and districts not doing anything to provide an equal educational opportunity for all students,” said Cynthia Brown of the Center for American Progress.
Romney slammed the Obama administration for failing to fund next year’s budget for the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program, created by Congress in 2004 as the first and only program to provide federal money for private school vouchers for low-income children. He said he wanted to expand the city’s voucher program to make it a “national showcase.”
A 2010 study by the U.S. Department of Education found “no conclusive evidence” that the program improved achievement, noting that students with vouchers had reading and math test scores that were statistically similar to those without them, although they were more likely to graduate high school.
Congressional supporters of the program, including House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., have been pushing the administration to fund the vouchers.
But Obama believes vouchers drain needed resources from public schools and do not help most students, James Kvaal, policy director for the Obama campaign, told reporters Wednesday. “Vouchers, which might serve a small number of students, will do nothing for the vast majority of students left behind in public schools,” he said.
Teacher unions are steadfastly opposed to vouchers.
“What Romney fails to understand is that when teachers and public schools have the resources they need, students win,” said Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers. “Real public education improvement comes from teachers, administrators, parents and communities rolling up their sleeves and working together to help all kids, not just some kids, succeed.”
Vouchers, an idea that has floated around for decades, began gaining traction across the country in 2010 after Republicans took majorities in several states. Louisiana, Indiana and other states have passed voucher programs that allow poor and even middle-income children to use state tax dollars toward private school tuition. Some legal challenges have arisen regarding the constitutionality of giving public dollars to private religious schools.
The Friedman Foundation for Educational Freedom, created by the late economist and free market advocate Milton Friedman, welcomed the injection of vouchers into the presidential campaign. “If you want to dramatically improve education, you have to give all parents the freedom to choose,” said Susan Meyers, a spokeswoman for the foundation.
In his speech, Romney lashed out at teacher unions, which he said were entrenched interests opposed to common-sense reforms.
“When your cause in life is preventing parents from having a meaningful choice or children from having a real chance, then you are on the wrong side,” Romney said. “You might even be in the wrong vocation, because good teachers put the interests of children first.”
Earlier this week, Romney announced a team of education advisers that included Rod Paige, the former education secretary who drew fire in 2004 when he called the National Education Association, the largest teacher union, a “terrorist organization.”
Romney also attacked Obama for his connection to the politically powerful unions, saying that the president is talking about reform while “indulging” the groups that are blocking it. “He can’t be the voice of disadvantaged public school kids and the protector of special interests,” Romney said. “We have to stop putting campaign cash ahead of our kids.”
Leaders of the teacher unions were attending a conference Wednesday about ways to work with management to improve schools. “His speech demonstrates a complete disdain for public schools and educators, ” said NEA President Dennis Van Roekel. “… He’s completely out of touch with what is happening in schools and classrooms across the country.”

Daily Herald, 23 May 2012


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  Disclaimer: The copyright of the contents of this blog remains with the original author / publisher.