S.No. |
Country |
Voucher Amount |
Who gets voucher |
Findings |
1. |
Chilet |
Money directly paid to schools on the basis
per student expenditure in public schools. Private schools may charge
extra tuitions. |
All children of school going age |
- Enrolment increased by 33%
|
2. |
Colombia |
100% of the tuition - 80%
from the National Government and 20% from Municipalities. |
Students from low income families - particularly
those
entering sixth grade are accepted by the participating private schools. |
- Secondary enrolment increased
|
3. |
Cote d’Ivoire |
Amount of funding varies
with school location and
tuition fees. At secondary
level, the amount is directly
tied with enrolment. Value of voucher is $200 for lower
secondary and $233 for
higher secondary. Higher
secondary schools must
qualify to get vouchers |
About 42% of public school students |
|
4. |
Czech Republic |
Private schools get 60% -
90% of public school funding per pupil. They charge the rest. |
All students enrolled |
- Large impact on secondary level enrollments
|
5. |
Denmark |
About 80-85% of school fee; remainder from
the parents. |
All students attending
private primary and
secondary and public
vocational schools |
- Dedicated teachers and decentralized system
- Competition between public and private schools
- Public perception of quality of public schools increased
|
6. |
Italy |
Ex post reimbursement of tuition expenses
given to students. Amount varies across the country, covering 25-80%
of tuition fee |
In all except two regions eligibility depends
on family income. In two regions it is based on academic achievement. |
|
7. |
New Zealand |
Full school tuition plus allowance of NZ$900
for primary students and NZ$1,100 for secondary students. |
160 students from families with an income
below NZ$25,000 |
- Schools have free control over hiring and firing of teachers,
operating budgets and selection of academic mission, student fees.
- Certain degree of competition between private schools
|
8. |
Sweden |
Selected private schools get money from municipal
school boards according to per pupil funding in public schools |
All children subject to compulsory education
at primary and secondary level |
- Competition from private schools improved academic achievement
in public schools
|
9. |
The Netherlands |
Equal funding to public and eligible private
schools. Weighted per student funding – giving more benefit
to poorer students. |
All students subject to compulsory education |
- No significant changes in achievement levels.
- Growing ethnic segregation between schools
|
10. |
England and Wales (UK) |
Only public schools eligible, therefore full
cost of education is borne by government |
All children |
- Academic achievement increased
- Negligible competition between private and public schools.
|
11. |
USA
|
|
|
|
|
Cleveland |
90% of tuition fee, up to $2,250 per year |
Low income students
selected through lottery |
- Parents satisfied with increased opportunities
- Increased test scores for voucher students
- Establishment of new schools
- Increase in quality of education
|
|
North Carolina |
Up to $1,700 per year |
Students from the
failing schools |
|
Florida |
Up to $4,00 per year |
About 1.5% of public
schools students in the district |
|
Milwaukee |
Up to $4,696 per year |
Students from low
income families enrolled from kindergarten to 4th grade |
|
New York |
Up to $1,400 per year |
Students in towns without public schools or
enough capacity in public schools |
|
Vermont |
About equal to government per capita spending
in public schools |
Students with family
income at or below
poverty line |
|
Washington D.C. |
60% of tuition expenses up to limit of $1,700 |
|