About us    Campaigns    Research    Publications    Media Room    Join Us    Contact us
 

NEWSLETTERS

Student First!
SF! Magazine

CHOICE TOOLS

School Choice Vs present Monopoly System
Global Experiments in School Voucher
Voucher schemes in India
Choice ideas for India

SCHOOL VOUCHER FOR GIRLS

400 girls from underprivileged community in North East Delhi were awarded vouchers worth upto Rs. 3700 per year
More [+]

ACTION FOR SCHOOL ADMISSION REFORMS (ASAR)

Joint Initiative of School Choice Campaign and www.schooladmissions.in
More [+]

STUDENT FIRST!

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for Student First!
Bi-Weekly Guide to School Choice
 
 
 

Home > Publications > Student First!

Student First!
Bi-Weekly Guide to School Choice


Issue # 311 | 20 January 2015

 

 

 

STUDENT FIRST!

YOUR BI-WEEKLY GUIDE TO SCHOOL CHOICE

 

 

RESEARCH, REPORTS AND PAPERS




The Two Tracks of School Reform

MICHAEL J. PETRILLI

 
For two decades now, education reformers have promoted a two-track strategy for improving our schools. The first track is standards-based: Set clear, high expectations in core academic subjects; test students regularly to see which schools and students are clearing the bar; and hold schools (and perhaps also educators and pupils) to account for the results. The second reform track is school choice: Allow parents to select among a wide array of education providers, encouraging innovation along the way. We have argued for years that these two tracks are interdependent — even codependent. Let us explain:

 

FULL PAPER >>




School choice and accountability: putting parents in charge

CENTREFORUM
 
Education is too important to be delivered without scrutiny. Parents, the government, further and higher education institutions and employers all have a right to know how pupils and schools are performing. There is good evidence to suggest that the accountability system boosts school and pupil performance; another reason why external stakeholders are so supportive of its existence. No one wants to return to the situation that pertained in England until the 1980s where only teachers knew – and were deemed to have a right to know – what went on in the classroom.

 

 

 

FULL PAPER >>




 

 

Rising Tide

CAROLINE HOXBY

 

The most scathing critique of voucher programs and charter schools is that they may bleed traditional public schools of their best students and most active parents, leaving the children who are left behind even worse off. Moreover, as the students leave, taking their per-pupil funding with them, the public schools will find themselves stripped of the human and monetary resources necessary to answer the call of competition. “Skimming,” the term of art for this hypothetical phenomenon, may lower overall achievement, as the downward spiral of the public schools swamps any gains made by the students who take advantage of school choice.




FULL PAPER >>




To improve schools, let teachers run them

DAVID OSBORNE

 

Walk through a typical public school, and you see students, sitting in rows of identical desks, listening to teachers talk. Unless the teacher is particularly inspiring, half of the students are zoning out. This isn’t just a problem for teachers, half of whom leave the profession within their first five years. It’s also a problem for their pupils: Disengaged teenagers do not make the best students. Now imagine if students were instead encouraged to work on projects they chose: building robots, writing plays, researching why bees are dying off by the millions.




FULL PAPER >>




The poor are voting with their feet for private schools

PRASHANTH PERUMAL

 

The problem with public schools, one is often told, is the lack of sufficient administrative supervision required to bring accountability to the system. Funds to aid learning are often misappropriated, children’s learning outcome is abysmally poor, and teachers that sleep and make merry in their classes are far too common in Indian public schools. It is not as if researchers on education do not recognize these problems, but the solutions they offer are often simply wrongheaded. With the release of the Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) 2014 last week, the chorus to improve teaching standards and accountability in public schools has once again begun.




FULL PAPER >>




CCS RESEARCH

 

Regulatory Structure of Higher Education in India

CENTRE FOR CIVIL SOCIETY
 

This report analyses the current regulatory framework of higher education in India and highlights areas that require important policy reforms in order to encourage greater private participation. This participation would eventually lead to a more competitive environment in the higher education sector and foster growth, which is needed to achieve the target of 10% increase in Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER) set by the 12th Five Year Plan (FYP). India has one of the largest higher education systems in the world, primarily dominated by private players who account for 60% of the total institutes and 64% of total enrolment of students. The higher education sector in India has a three-tier structure comprising the university, college and course. This forms a vital link with the regulatory structure, and with accreditation agencies playing the key role in maintaining quality and standards in this sector.




FULL PAPER >>




RTE 2.0

CENTRE FOR CIVIL SOCIETY
 

With the objective of shifting regulatory focus towards some of the above issues, Centre for Civil Society brought together some of India’s eminent educationists and thought leaders to identify specific amendments to the RTE Act, which would ensure quality education for all in India. Key concerns regarding the structure and impact of the RTE were discussed, and based on this, recommendations for amendments to the RTE Act 2009 have been drafted. RTE 2.0: Building Consensus on Amendments truly aimed at weeding out the pain areas in the existing scheme of things, finding out what works and what doesn’t, and introducing actual amendments to the text of the Act.




FULL PAPER >>




Social Audit Framework for the Education Sector

Vrinda Pareek
 

The paper seeks to define social audit, following which it will undertake a study of certain provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE) so as to identify the social audit requirements of the Act. In order to do so, a study of previously employed social audit models/ frameworks across the livelihood sector will be conducted by studying the social audit of the MNREGA scheme. Case studies of education sector social audit models across Bhutan and Brazil will follow the cross-sectoral analysis. All parameters so derived will then be further built upon by a ground-level study of the stakeholders- primarily students, parents and teachers- and their expectations of the education system. The final product of the paper will be a comprehensive set of parameters for social audit in the education sector, derived cumulatively from the aforementioned methods.




FULL PAPER >>

 



Brought to you by School Choice Campaign and The RTE Platform

Centre for Civil Society | A 69, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016 IN

 

Feedback/contributions: schoolchoice@ccs.in

RTE-related queries: info@righttoeducation.in


Facebook // Twitter // YouTube

 

Disclaimer: Copyrights remain with the original authors/publishers

SchoolChoice.in

 

RightToEducation.in


CCS 

 


Archives

button 2015

 

SUPPORT US

Fund the Campaign
Registry
Become a Partner

EVENTS

School Choice National Conference 2014 - Freedom in Education
  More [+]

FROM NEWSROOM

India must regain its past glory in education: President
National Education Policy Soon, Sports to be Part of School Curriculum
  More [+]

SF! Magazine!

March 2012
Archives [+]

MESSAGE BOARD

 

SCC VIDEOS

 
 
Managed by Centre for Civil Society